Qin Sun, Meng Meng, Jeffrey N. Steed, Stephanie J. Sidow, Brian E. Bergeron, Li-na Niu, Jing-zhi Ma, Franklin R. Tay, Manoeuvrability and biocompatibility of endodontic tricalcium silicate-based putties,Journal of Dentistry, Volume 104,2021,103530,ISSN 0300-5712

MANOEUVRABILITY AND BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF ENDODONTIC TRICALCIUM SILICATE-BASED PUTTIES

PURPOSE

The present study evaluated the indentation depth, storage modulus and biocompatibility of an experimental endodontic putty designed for endodontic perforation repair and direct pulp-capping (NeoPutty). The results were compared with the properties associated with the commercially available EndoSequence BC RRM Putty (ES Putty).

METHODS

Indentation depth was measured by a profilometer following indentation with the 1/4 lb Gilmore needle. Elastic modulus was evaluated using a strain-controlled rheometer. The effects of eluents derived from these two putties were examined on the viability and proliferation of human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs) and human periodontal ligament fibroblasts (hPDLFs), before (1 st testing cycle) and after complete setting (2nd testing cycle).

RESULTS

The ES Putty became more difficult to ident and acquired a larger storage modulus after exposure to atmospheric moisture. Biocompatibility results indicated that both putties were relatively more cytotoxic than the bioinert Teflon negative control, but much less cytotoxic than the zinc oxide–eugenol cement negative control. NeoPutty was less cytotoxic than ES putty in the 1st testing cycle, particularly with hDPSCs. Both putties exhibited more favourable cytotoxicity profiles after complete setting.

CONCLUSION

NeoPutty has a better window of maneuverability after exposure to atmospheric moisture. From an in vitro cytotoxicity perspective, the NeoPutty may be considered more biocompatible than ES putty.